ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Appellate Law and Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Appellate Law and Practice

CA1: Brazilian not oppressed by ANY government

By S. COTUS

ADVERTISEMENTS
Lordes v. Mukasey, No. 07-1968 denies a petition for review of a Brazilian.  Okay, how are Brazilians oppressed?  All they do is Samba and get plastic surgery.  He was a member of a union.  The First rejects the idea that the ?jurisdictional bar? over review of late filed petitions violates due process under Hana v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 39, 43 (1st Cir. 2007) (our coverage here).  But, let?s look at what Hana says:While we have not previously addressed the question whether read more

To access this complete feed in the blog feed reader login or register for free.

Full post as published by Appellate Law and Practice on August 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0025 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:38:25)