ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Nations Torn over eBay Liability in Fake-Goods Cases

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

ebayWe’ve been tracking the many lawsuits over whether eBay is responsible for vetting counterfeit goods that are sold on its site. Why? Because circuit splits are nice, but country splits are even better.

So far here’s where we stand: Last month, a French court upheld a ruling that eBay pay LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton and sister company Christian Dior $63.1 million in damages for auctioning fake goods. LVMH had accused eBay of not taking the necessary steps to ensure that the accessories sold on its site weren’t counterfeit. Some called it a hometown verdict. Then, a week later, across the pond, eBay’s fortunes turned. U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan ruled that Tiffany, not eBay, must bear the burden of monitoring its trademark, including that lovely Tiffany Blue box, which helps us all aspire to a higher standard.

Today, reports Roger Parloff over at Fortune’s Legal Pad blog, the eBay counterfeit saga takes us back to Europe. In a case brought by L’Oréal Group, the Belgian Tribunal de Commerce exonerated eBay of any wrongdoing related to counterfeits of Lancôme perfumes.

The Belgian ruling, reports Parloff, finds that eBay is a passive provider of “host” services, as that term is defined in a European Community policy directive, and that it’s therefore entitled to more legal leeway than a brick-and-mortar auctioneer would receive if counterfeit goods were being sold on his premises.

“L’Oréal believes the court to be mistaken in its decision to minimise the role of eBay in the sale of products on its platform,” said the company in a statement. “L’Oréal believes that this judgment by the court digresses from the interpretation of the eCommerce Directive provided in recent months by the European Commission. . . . L’Oréal intends to appeal this decision.”

We’re not sure how country splits get resolved in such matters (or if they get resolved at all), but we’ll be sure to keep you posted on the next court to weigh it, be it in Moscow, Rio or Timbuktu.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on August 12, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0035 secs (from cache 10/31/26 06:26:34)