Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Oregon Legal Research
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Oregon Legal ResearchTraffic? (by Tom Vanderbilt): An alternate title for the book might be ?Idiots.?
See also this recent news story:
Use turn signal? Why?: $75 TICKET: It's an all-too-common attitude, and it can cost you, cops say,? Chicago Sun-Times (online), August 11, 2008, by Mary Wisniewski.
Excerpts:
?Failure of other drivers to use a turn signal is one of the most annoying things on the road, and it may be on the rise, according to the State Police. The officers who patrol the state's highways have been giving out more warnings for improper signal use in the last 2½ years?. Failure to use a signal can be a "very serious and deadly mistake," said Ley. "Officers know this can lead to a serious accident." So why don't people signal? To paraphrase Tom Vanderbilt, author of the book Danek says some people are afraid that if they signal to change lanes, the car in the next lane will speed up to block their car. He said it's also a matter of habit -- like buckling your seat belt. Some people aren't taught properly and don't get into the habit of doing it. He noted that turn signals didn't even become standard in cars until the 1960s -- people who wanted to signal used to have to stick their left arm out the window. A 2006 survey by Response Insurance, a national car insurer, found that 57 percent of American drivers don't signal when changing lanes. Men are less likely to signal than women, and drivers under 25 are less likely to signal than older drivers. Their reasons were a bit scary: ? ? 42 percent said they didn't have time, Danek says he teaches his students to signal because it's safer to warn people what you're doing, and anything that makes driving safer is worthwhile. But Danek also teaches them to be prepared if someone doesn't signal?.?
? ? 23 percent said they were lazy,
? ? 17 percent said they don't because they forget to turn it off,
? ? 12 percent said they changed lanes too frequently to bother,
? ? 11 percent said it was not important,
? ? 8 percent said they don't because other drivers don't. And, most disturbing of all,
? ? 7 percent skipped the signal to "add excitement" to their trip.
Google [Traffic Tom Vanderbilt] for reviews and commentary on the book, Traffic.
Full post as published by Oregon Legal Research on August 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Women and the Law
Ttile IX
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
City of Fargo To Pay for Excessive Traffic Fines
City of Fargo To Pay for Excessive Traffic Fines
Google
Settles Book-Scanning Class Actions for $125 Million
Amazon
Facing Class Action over Book Deletions
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Pollution
50% Increased Risk for Allergy and Asthma from Traffic Fumes

Communication from the Vanderbilt Law Review
Vanderbilt Law Review Saves 40% of Slots for Fall
Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 61, Number 4 (May 2008)
Vanderbilt adds police K-9 teams www.privateofficer.com
Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 61, Number 3 (April 2008)








