Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act BlogReverse Domain Name Hijacking Decision Under the UDRP: What Was The Attorney Thinking?
By Enrico Schaefer
Full post as published by AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Blog on August 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Reverse Mortgages
Consumer facts
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Power of Attorney and Living Wills for the aged
Options for caring for aging parents
Estate Planning
Documents: durable power of attorney, living will, letter of instruction, and insurance trust
Grandparents Visitation Rights
Every state lets elderly grandparents petition to visit grandchildren
Whole Foods
And Other Firms Sued by California Attorney General,
State Farm
Settles with Mississippi Attorney General
Ticketmaster Entertainment
Settles with New Jersey Attorney General
Network Solutions and ICANN
allegedly registers searched domain names to prevent others from selling and forces customers to pay expensive fees.
Eminent Domain
University of Akron pays property owner $443,000 settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.

Passive Holding Is Enough to Satisfy Bad Faith Use Requirements Under the UDRP
Beware of Domain Name Traffickers
What A Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Opinion Looks Like
Domain Name Dispute Decision: Craigslist.fr UDRP Transfer Order From WIPO
Habitual Cybersquatter under the UDRP: Caribbean Online International Ltd.
Domain Name Disputes: Arbitration versus Litigation







