Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizControlling already-created innovation?
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
In an article titled The Impact of Compulsory Licensing on Foreign Direct Investment: A Collective Bargaining Approach, Robert Bird and Daniel R. Cahoy cite Mark A. Lemley in Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property, 71 U. CHI. L. REV. 129, 148-49 (2004) for the proposition that many economic theorists improperly focus on patent rules as a means of controlling already-created innovation, rather than on incentives to produce the innovation.Another example of confusion between the concepts of invention and of innovation.
Full post as published by IPBiz on August 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

The Law and Economics of Innovation: Patents and the Commercialization of Innovation
Nguyen & Maine: Acquiring Innovation
Announcement: Patents and the Commercialization of Innovation
Review of Australia's national innovation system
District Court Must Provide Underlying Reasoning For "Exceptional Case" Determination









