ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: IPBiz

Foreseeability and obviousness

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
In an article about possible changes to McDonalds "dollar menu," one has the text:

Lower-priced beverages, including $1.89 iced coffee and a $1 fountain-drink and sweet-tea promotion, have pulled some sales away from the espresso drinks, which range from about $2 to $3. That was something the company hadn't anticipated, he [Don Thompson, president of McDonald's U.S. business] said.

Hmmm, if the president of McDonald's US business could not foresee that lower-priced beverages might be substituted for higher-priced beverages, especially in a bad economy, what does that say about the use of foreseeability in obviousness-determinations in patent law? It is always easy to see the right path in hindsight.

On the other side of the coin, was the "paper or plastic" claim of IBM's 7,407,089 obvious -->

A method of determining a customer's packaging preference in a conventional point-of-sale retail location, wherein the point-of-sale retail location includes a person who performs the packaging of items purchased in the point-of-sale retail location for the customer, comprising the steps of: identifying the customer using a customer identifier; and retrieving available container packaging preference information for the purchased items using the customer identifier for the identified customer.

The background of the '089 patent states:

In retail locations such as grocery stores, liquor & wine stores, hardware and department stores, customers typically must pass through a cashier station to pay for items they wish to purchase. At the cashier station, the cashier may package the purchased items for the customer so that the customer can conveniently carry the items out of the store. If different packaging options are offered, the customer may have a preference as to the type of packaging desired. However, at conventional retail locations, the customer is likely to be asked for their packaging preference each time the customer passes through a cashier station, resulting in unnecessary inconvenience for both the customer and the cashier.

What is needed is a more flexible system and method for determining packaging preference that overcomes some of these limitations.

Full post as published by IPBiz on August 07, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0158 secs (new cache)