ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Copyright Law

: Recording Industry vs The People

MPAA loses in case against Cablevision, Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings

By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

The MPAA's copyright infringement claim against Cablevision, based upon its claim that Cablevision's proposed remote storage digital video recorder system violated the motion picture companies' "performance" rights and "reproduction" rights, in Cartoon Networks v. CSC Holdings, has been rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The lower court decison of Judge Denny Chin, which ruled in favor of the motion picture companies, was reversed.

On the issue of the "reproduction" right, the Court held that:

(1) the buffered versions were not "copies" within the meaning of the Copyright Act since the 1.2-second period in which they were buffered was insufficient to satisfy the part of the statutory definition of copies which required that they exist for more than a "transitory duration"; and

(2) as to the playback versions, Cablevision could not be directly liable, since it was the customer -- not Cablevision -- that was making the copies; i.e., there was no "volitional" conduct on Cablevision's part.

On the issue of the "public performance" right, the Court found for the defendant on the ground that the transmission was not "to the public". (The Court called into question the 3rd Circuit decision in Ford Motor v. Summit Motor Products which said that a distribution to one person could be "to the public", but did not need to reach the question since this was a "public performance" right, rather than a "distribution" right, case.).

The defeated lawyers for the MPAA include the same lawyers who represent Viacom in Viacom v. YouTube, the same lawyers who represent the RIAA in Arista v. LimeWire, and the appellate lawyer who was flown into Duluth by the RIAA for the Capitol v. Thomas argument.

August 4, 2008, Decision, U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit


Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property

Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on August 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0202 secs (new cache)