ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal Featured Columnists August 4, 2008

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS

If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed.

http://www.nylj.com

Subscription requried for online access:

Condemnation and Tax Certiorari
Monday, August 4, 2008
By M. Robert Goldstein and Michael Rikon

"M. Robert Goldstein and Michael Rikon, partners of Goldstein, Goldstein, Rikon & Gottlieb, admit to being puzzled by a recent decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department. The issue was the valuation date of the taking. What puzzled them? The loose use of terms when a taking was adjudicated. Both decisions used the same words to describe something different."

Employment Law
Monday, August 4, 2008
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas

"Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, analyze a recent Supreme Court ruling that makes clear that indirect evidence may be used to establish that a conflict of interest affected a benefits decision. Accordingly, they, say, fiduciaries and plan sponsors should consider taking several steps to increase the likelihood that a reviewing court will grant deference to the fiduciary's decisions."

OUTSIDE COUNSEL:

AIA Document A201-2007, ConsensusDOCS 200 Forms
Monday, August 4, 2008
By Brian G. Lustbader

" Brian G. Lustbader, counsel to Mazur, Carp & Rubin, writes that every 10 years or so, the American Institute of Architects revises its form construction documents. Those revisions are typically substantive and extensive, and the latest revisions, the 2007 form documents, are no exception. It is therefore of critical importance, he notes, that all parties to construction projects, owners, developers, construction managers, contractors, and subcontractors, carefully analyze the new documents with their counsel and make appropriate modifications before signing them. "

 

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on August 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0122 secs (new cache)