ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Administrative Law Blogs -> Within the Scope

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Administrative Law

: Within the Scope

35 Years Hence, Our Contemporary Fault Line on Abortion

By E.L. Lipman

ADVERTISEMENTS
If art is a hammer, then perhaps case law is our mirror. It reflects back a snapshot of our present circumstances, framing in full color our successes in presenting ourselves and the areas in which we still struggle.

Tuesday, having been 35 years to the day that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, it occurred to me that a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, involving a similarly pseudonymed plaintiff, in a challenge to state abortion regulations, issued on that anniversary, was just such a reflective marker of our time.

At issue in the contemporary challenge by Jane Roe, was whether a Missouri prison regulation that prohibited travel by women inmates outside of the facility for elective abortions, violated rights that were otherwise guaranteed to the inmates by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. A lower court enjoined the Missouri jailers from enforcing the restriction against women seeking elective abortions, on the grounds that the prohibition did not comport with due process and amounted to cruel and unusual punishment.

Agreeing only in part, the appellate panel held that Missouri?s prohibition on security escorted travel outside of the prison for elective abortions was not rationally related to the goal of reducing the risk of inmate escape; because the regulation did permit travel under an escort for other types of medical care ? including the prenatal care and delivery that would ordinarily follow if an abortion were not obtained. Parting company with the lower court, however, the appellate panel went on to instruct that elective abortions did not present the type of ?serious medical need? which, if withheld by prison officials, would amount to ?egregious treatment that the Eighth Amendment proscribes.?

The panel?s complete analysis, which includes a discussion of the earlier Roe and the cases that followed it, is accessible here.

Full post as published by Within the Scope on January 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 15:05:27)