ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

2nd Cir. Reverses Convictions in Specialist Cases; SDNY Loses Again

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

When it comes to prosecuting so-called specialist traders, SDNY prosecutors are making a rough go of things. A couple weeks ago, we told you about the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the acquittal of David Finnerty, a former specialist trader at Fleet Specialist, who had been accused of making improper trades for his firm’s account at the NYSE. Today, the Second Circuit reversed the convictions of two more specialists — Michael Hayward and Michael Stern, formerly of Van der Moolen Specialists USA.

Hayward and Stern had been convicted, following jury trials, of securities fraud for allegedly trading for their proprietary accounts instead of matching executable buy and sell orders from NYSE customers. (Specialist traders match buyers and sellers at the NYSE — now part of NYSE Euronext — and provide liquidity by buying or selling shares when there is an imbalance on the floor.) According to a report by WSJ colleague Chad Bray (link unavailable), the government had argued at trial that Hayward and Stern violated federal securities laws by engaging in interpositioning - improperly stepping between public buy and sell orders and trading for their firm’s account.

In overturning the conviction, the Second Circuit writes, in a three-page order, “Since the Government concedes that Defendants’ conduct was not manipulative, the question is whether the Government sufficiently proved that it was deceptive . . . In Finnerty, we observed that “‘deception’ . . . irreducibly entails some act that gives the victim a false impression,” but the Government “identified no way in which Finnerty communicated anything to his customers, let alone anything false.”

At most, the court explains, Finnerty violated an NYSE rule, but violation of an NYSE rule does not a case for civil liability make. “Finnerty compels the same result here.”

Cooley Godward’s Jonathan Bach repped Hayward, while Stern turned to Clifford Chance’s David Meister.

For the prosecution, AUSA Lauren Goldberg.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on July 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)