ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentIL: DUI qualifies for hot pursuit under Santana and not Welsh because DUI was jailable
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Hot pursuit of a DUI suspect (a class A misdemeanor) justified entry into the defendant's home. This situation is like Santana, and Welsh is distinguished because it involved a fine-only offense, not a jailable offense. People v. Wear, 2008 Ill. LEXIS 636 (July 24, 2008):
Here, we see little relevant difference between this case and Santana. In both cases, the officers had probable cause to arrest when they were standing in the doorway, which is considered a public place. The Santana Court held that police were not required to refrain from entering the home and arresting her without a warrant. Similarly, Officer Dawdy was not required to refrain from entering Foiles' home and arresting Wear without a warrant because he had probable cause to arrest the Wear at the threshold and Wear continued inside...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on July 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Welsh: The Future of Education
Eighth Circuit Upholds Warrantless Destruction of Property
Riskin on & Welsh on Court-Oriented Mediation







