ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> NLRB Law Memo

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: NLRB Law Memo

NLRB Law Memo 07/26/2008

ADVERTISEMENTS

NLRB Law Memo 07/26/2008
by
LawMemo - First in Employment Law.
Also by free weekly email.

NLRB - General Counsel Memorandum on ULPs involving political activity.

Guideline Memorandum Concerning Unfair Labor Practice Charges Involving Political Advocacy (07/22/2008)
http://www.lawmemo.com/nlrb/gc08-10.pdf

Part I of the memorandum examines the Board jurisprudence determining when employee political advocacy falls within the "mutual aid or protection" clause of Section 7. The Board's test is whether there is a direct nexus between employment-related concerns and the specific issues that are the subject of the advocacy. To illustrate how this test should be applied, the memorandum examines recent advocacy regarding immigration law reforms. Part II contains a discussion of whether, assuming that the object of the political advocacy at issue is within the "mutual aid or protection" clause, that advocacy is protected because of the specific means employed. The memorandum reviews the various activities in which employees might typically engage and consider when the employees' activity is protected. Part III contains instructions for processing charges involving political advocacy. Regions will submit all such cases to the Division of Advice with a recommendation as to whether a complaint is warranted under the analytical framework and discussion set forth in this memorandum.

NLRB - Staff summarized 1 decision.

Magic Beans, LLC (1-RC-22148; 352 NLRB No. 107) Brighton, MA July 18, 2008.
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/352/v352107.htm

The Board reversed the hearing officer's findings and found that the Employer's objection, effectively a post-election challenge, to Robert Collum's eligibility was not properly before the Board under the standard set forth in NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 333 (1946). The Board found that the Petitioner (Teamsters Local 25) was not on notice, prior to the election, that Collum may have been ineligible to vote. Therefore, the Board overruled the Employer's objection and issued the appropriate certification of representative.

(Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman participated.)

***

Full post as published by NLRB Law Memo on July 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)