ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

In-House Counsel

: Law Department Management

Multiple cautions about multiple-choice questions on surveys

By Rees Morrison

ADVERTISEMENTS

Surveys of law departments frequently have multiple-choice questions, even though such questions are beset with methodological traps. Here are my blog posts on the topic.

Strive to cover every reasonable choice and not have choices overlap (See my post of June 16, 2007: the test of Mutually Exclusive, Comprehensively Exhaustive.). To do so, selections need to be defined tightly and worded carefully. Recognize that some plausible choices are likely to have been omitted and cover them with a selection for ?Other? (See my posts of April 12, 2006 and July 14, 2005: importance of ?Other? as a choice.).

The wording, number, and order of the choices make a difference. List selections neutrally, such as alphabetically, and make no effort to influence people by the order of choices (See my post of Dec. 20, 2005: the order of questions.). Avoid disjunctives such as ?Knowledge of industry or experience? since you can?t untangle the combined concepts. Limit any one question to no more than seven or eight selections, since the number of selections has an effect on how people answer them (See my post of Nov. 13, 2006: decision difficulties when there are too many choices.).

Don?t invite respondents to ?choose all that apply? (See my posts of July 21, 2005 and Dec. 20, 2005: criticize the methodology; and March 13, 2006: ?choose more than one.?). Better to ask respondents to pick their top three or four of a large set (See my posts of Aug. 14, 2005 on this variation; Nov. 5, 2006; July 4, 2006: ?pick the top 5?; and Nov. 5, 2006: ?pick your top three from ten.?).

Even better is to ask respondents to rank their choices or their top few (See my posts of Dec. 20, 2005 and March 31, 2007: prioritize choices.). One problem with this step if you ask for all the choices to be ranked is that even choices undesirable to the respondent will be ranked. They can also misread the instructions and reverse their ranking from what you wanted.

Best of all for multiple-choice questions is to ask survey respondents to allocate 100 points among the choices (See my post of July 4, 2006: sophisticated technique.). They can give as many points as they want to their most favored choice and sprinkle fewer points among the remainder as they see fit. The downside is that respondents must think more and take more time, which discourages participation.

Full post as published by Law Department Management on July 20, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:01:53)