ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Niches Blogs -> New Jersey Eminent Domain Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Niches

: New Jersey Eminent Domain Blog

NJDEP required to use eminent domain in beachfront easements

By William J. Ward

ADVERTISEMENTS

In a unanimous per curiam opinion issued yesterday, July 15, 2008, the Appellate Division affirmed a lower court decision by Chancery Court Judge Vincent J. Grasso denying an injunction to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to compel beach front property owners on Long Beach Island to grant easements for beachfront replenishment. NJDEP requested easements from the property owners in order to construct a 21-foot sand dune on the affected properties along the oceanfront. The court held that NJDEP was improperly relying on N.J.S.A. 12:6A-1 which deals with access for emergent situations.

In this case, Milgram v. Ginaldi, NJDEP sought to acquire a permanent easement to construct and maintain the sand dunes. In order to do this, the court ruled, NJDEP must comply with the Eminent Domain Act, N.J.S.A. 20:3-1, et seq. and its provisions regarding acquisitions of land for a public purpose. Specifically, N.J.S.A. 20-:3-6 requires that

Whenever any condemnor shall have determined to acquire property pursuant to law, including public property already devoted to public purpose, but cannot acquire title thereto or possession thereof by agreement with a prospective condemnee, whether by reason of disagreement concerning the compensation to be paid or for any other cause, the condemnation of such property and the compensation to be paid therefor, and to whom payable, and all matters incidental thereto and arising therefrom shall be governed, ascertained and paid by and in the manner provided by this act.

The court concludes:

...the trial court correctly dismissed NJDEP's cause of action, because, under these circumstances, a demand for a perpetual easement from these defendants amounted to a taking of private property without just compensation. To accomplish this apparently legitimate public purpose, NJDEP was required to comply with the procedural requirements of the Eminent Domain Act.

This case is precedent for other municipalities on Long Beach Island seeking to acquire similar easements. The township of Harvey Cedars, for example, is about to engage in such an effort, and they clearly will have to comply with the Eminent Domain Act of 1971 and all of its requirements regarding land acquisitions.  Download the opinion in Milgrim v. Ginaldi.

Also see today's Star-Ledger article, "Court sides with residents in beach battle."

Full post as published by New Jersey Eminent Domain Blog on July 16, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.033 secs (new cache)