Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> BusinessAssociationsBlog.com
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: BusinessAssociationsBlog.comCA v AFSCME: DGCL § 109 versus § 141
By Stephen Bainbridge
ADVERTISEMENTS
Lisa Fairfax reports that the oral argument in CA v. AFSCME raised interesting issues with respect to mandatory bylaws:
First, counsel for CA appeared to be arguing that the fact that the by-law was mandatory and unqualified violated Delaware law because, by requiring the reimbursement of all successful candidates, it improperly took away directors’ discretion to determine how to allocate...[continued on site]
Full post as published by BusinessAssociationsBlog.com on July 14, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

eDelaware: New Service Offered by Potter Anderson & Corroon for Mobile Access to DGCL
CA v. AFSCME: The Supreme Court Giveth And The Supreme Court Taketh Away
CA v. AFSCME: The Delaware Supreme Court Giveth and the Supreme Court Taketh Away
Delaware Supreme Court: CA/AFSCME Certification Accepted and Fast Tracked
Delaware Supreme Court: CA/AFSCME Certification Accepted and on Fast Track
Oral Arguments in CA v. AFSCME









