Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> The Trade Secrets Vault
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: The Trade Secrets VaultTRADE SECRETS AND THE ROME II REGULATION ON THE LAW APPLICABLE TO NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
ADVERTISEMENTS
E.I.P.R. 2008, 30(8), 309-319
Christopher Wadlow.
Abstract: Discusses the protection of trade secrets in private international law, focusing on the impact of Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II). Notes what is determined by the applicable law and details the approach of the travaux preparatoires and Regulation to unfair competition. Reflects on the problems that lack of a harmonised trade secrets law poses for the practical application of the three alternative rules in art.4, including the difficulty of applying the common personal law rule, establishing what constitutes damage and determining the "proper law" of the tort.
Introduction
This is the second of two connected articles on the protection of trade secrets in private international law. The first, published as [2008] 30 E.I.P.R. 269, dealt with jurisdiction over trade secret actions under the Jurisdiction Regulation. [FN1] Like the present article, which deals specifically with the law applicable to non-contractual claims for trade secret protection, it was based on a presentation given by the author at the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) Conference Breach of Confidence and Trade Secrets: Domestic Developments and Comparative Perspectives under the title "Trade Secrets in Private International Law". [FN2] At that time, the text of the Rome II Regulation [FN3] had not been finalised, and references to it were necessarily tentative. Now that the Regulation has been adopted and is about to come into force, [FN4] it is all too clear that its application to trade secret actions cannot be summarised in a few words.Full post as published by The Trade Secrets Vault on July 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Lawsuits and Settlements
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Trade Secrets and International Law
Trinity College Dublin to Host Conference on Rome II Regulation
Weintraub on Rome II: Simple and Predictable, Consequences-Based, or Neither









