Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousRecent BPAI Decisions
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Precedential:
Ex parte Ghuman, Appeal No. 2008-1175 (BPAI May 1, 2008)(rejected claims that are not appealed are considered withdrawn and subject to cancellation by examiner).
Ex parte Fu, Appeal No. 2008-0601, 2008 WL 867826 (BPAI March 31, 2008) (applying KSR to find it obvious to substitute one species for its genus where the genus contains a limited number of species).
Ex Parte Nehls, Appeal No. 2007-1823, 2008 WL 258370 (BPAI January 28, 2008) (“substantial” and “specif read more
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on July 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

BPAI Raises Stakes for In Re Bilksi and the Future of Software Patents
Unconstitutional law to fix unconstitutional law
29 Percent of Librarians Dissatisfied with Non-Librarian Decisions, Very Dissatisfied
First Topic: Broadest Reasonable Interpretation









