Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Honolulu Personal Injury LawyerU.S. Supreme Court Limits Punitive Damages
By Wayne Parsons
In one of the most important decisions since the addition of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court's decision in Exxon Shipping v. Baker took away the jury verdict against Exxon and reduced it to the standard that punitive damages should not be greater than other damages in a case. This decision, written by Justice Souter, folloows an earlier decision in Campbell v. State Farm that limited punitive damages to no more than 10 times other damages in the case.
Justice Souter dispelled the common myth that punitive damage awards are a rampant problem noting studies that show that the frequency and size of punitive damage awards are not a problem in general.
In a trial where punitive damages are an issue, the plaintiff usually argues that the purpose of punitive damages is to send a message to the defendant that they should not put profits over human life and safety. The idea is to make an impact on the pocket book of the wrongdoer. Long ago, in the exploding gas tank case, the evidence showed that the automobile manufactuer knew that the gas tanks would explode and would cause burn injuries and eaths but went with a cheap part instead of a slightly more expensive part. The manufacturer actually calculated that the savings on the cheap part coupled with the cost of a recall and the payments to the families of injured and dead passengers would cost about $600 million. They decided to take that riskj rather than fixing the cars. When the jury saw this evidence they awarded $600 million in punitive damages to teach the manufacturer that it should not put profits over people.
If a company has billions in profits then a few million is not a penalty. Companies will now have more reason to gamble with your health and safety in their pursuit of profits. Attorneys will be less likely to take on these difficult cases that can go over for 10 or 20 years. Attorneys reprepresenting consumers in these cases do not get paid until money is collected and so they must wait 10 or 20 years to be paid. In addition, the attorneys often pay over a million dollars in court costs, expert fees and research.
The Exxon decision is a blow to civil justice and to the public who can expect to see more dangerous products in the stores and less safe medications and automobiles.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Wayne ParsonsFull post as published by Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer on July 04, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Ministry of Defense
$500,000 in damages in transgender humiliation suit.
The Ministry of Defense
$500,000 in damages in transgender humiliation suit.
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

New Jersey Supreme Court Limits the Use of Punitive Damages
"Oregon Supreme Court rules punitive damages excessive"
Appeal dismissed where there was still a claim for punitive damages pending
Foreign Courts Wary of U.S. Punitive Damages
"2008 Election, the Supreme Court and Punitive Damages"
Oregon Supreme Court Sets 4 to1 Ratio on Punitive Damages in Economic Injury Cases








