Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime and ConsequencesBlog Scan
By Kent Scheidegger et al.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Today's New York Times Kennedy Article: Matthew Franck at Bench Memos has a post discussing why Linda Greenhouse's article on Kennedy made the front page of the New York Times today. The article, summarized in our News Scan, can be found here. As Greenhouse points out in the article, the factual error relied on by the majority opinion went to a "central part of the court?s analysis." In his post, Franck wonders how this error escaped all nine Justices' attention. The oversight is particularly disconcerting because the Kennedy majority based its opinion on its understanding of "evolving standards of decency." This worries Franck because: "When the Court consults "objective evidence of contemporary values," it engages in something other than legal reasoning...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime and Consequences on July 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Reduce bloated PDFs with ease.
Miese Scan-Qualität der Bielefelder Aufklärungszeitschriften
#^%$&* Scanner, Or Hints From Heloise
Delayed Brain Scan Leads to Damages Award









