Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Mirror of Justice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Mirror of JusticeInteresting Subject Matter
By Michael Perry
| The Catholic Scare: How Anti-Catholic Prejudice Shaped Brown v. Board |
|
GLENNA GOLDIS New York University School of Law January 11, 2008 |
Abstract:
This essay examines supreme court justice Hugo
L. Black and his times, focusing on the evolving relationship between the
Catholic Church and the legal elite. Part II introduces the compulsory public
school movement of the 1920s. Part III describes Black's career prior to the
Supreme Court, including his membership in the Ku Klux Klan. Contrary to what
Black would later claim, politics did not require him to join the Ku Klux Klan.
Part IV introduces the Roosevelt Court of the 1940s and the race and religion
politics of that era. This section also analyzes Black's majority opinion in
Everson, arguing that he voted with the pro-Catholic side in order to bait the
dissenters into agreeing with anti-Catholic logic. Part V recounts education
debates of the 1950s and shows that progressive elites routinely slurred
parochial schooling as segregation. They professed the ideal of one school
system for all children¿black and white, Protestant and Catholic. A textual
analysis of three related school desegregation cases shows that Black tried to
use them to advance the reincarnated compulsory public education movement. Part
VI concludes that Black had a tremendous impact on law and none on society.
Suggested Citation
Goldis, Glenna, "The Catholic Scare: How Anti-Catholic Prejudice
Shaped Brown v. Board" (January 11, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1084764
Full post as published by Mirror of Justice on January 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Oil and Gas
industry workers allegedly subject to serious accident injury from hazardous conditions.
Explicit E-Mail
Adult website fined $413,000 in explicit e-mail matter.

Appealing Non-Final Rejections in Continuing Applications
CA1: 1983 state action failures are not a matter of subject matter jurisdiction
Interesting Editorial on the Subject of Patent Reform in this Presidential Election
R. v. L.M. - Its A Bad Day To Be A Pedophile
Straub: No Subject Matter Jurisdiction needed for Criminal Contempt







