Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Lawbeat
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: LawbeatGreenhouse and Fidell's last laugh
By Mark Obbie
ADVERTISEMENTS
Linda Greenhouse has taken heat for her husband's legal expertise in military law -- specifically for his advocacy in causes that have come before the Court. But on today's front page, barely two weeks before her retirement, Greenhouse nails a good story thanks to that familial connection.Over the weekend, Greenhouse says in an e-mail, her husband, Eugene Fidell, spotted a blog post that claimed the Supreme Court's majority decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana erred when it tallied how many jurisdictions have statutes that would punish the rape of a child with the death penalty. The tally, in Justice Anthony Kennedy's controversial majority opinion, left out military law. Dwight Sullivan, a civilian appellate defense counsel in the Air Force Appellate Defense Division, noticed the omission. Sullivan blogged on Saturday night at his CAAFlog blog that in 2006, Congress revised the Uniform Code of Military Justice to punish child-rape with death. The title of his brief but authoritative post says it all: "The Supremes dis the military justice system." Greenhouse wrote in an e-mail, in response to my questions about the origin of the story, that she and Fidell had different takes on what to do with the information:His instinct as a lawyer was to bring the information to the attention of the Louisiana attorney general's office. My instinct was that it was a great story. I won.
Well, they both won, since the Louisiana AG surely can't miss an above-the-fold front-pager that says a key factual underpinning in a close decision that went against his client was in error -- and hadn't been found by any of the parties or amici that briefed the case (or by any of the reporters who covered it). As for Sullivan, his serious, substantive blog gets some deserved notoriety -- and even a rare link from the text of a Times story (rather than just linking from sidebar material).Full post as published by Lawbeat on July 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"Greenhouse and Fidell's last laugh"
Law - NYT reporter Linda Greenhouse may move on
Linda Greenhouse Leaving the NY Times
National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting System Regulations
"That is not something to laugh about"







