ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> McLeod Law Offices

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Bankruptcy

: McLeod Law Offices

The 401(k) in Chapter 13

By Bill McLeod, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

In a recent decision, a Massachusetts Bankruptcy Judge ruled that a Chapter 13 debtor may deduct contributions to a 401(k) retirement plan while in bankruptcy. It?s a ruling anyone contemplating chapter 13 should pay attention to.

The debtor?s schedules listed his gross income as $9,666.67 per month. After taxes, insurance and 401(k) contribution of $966.66, that left $5,604.67. The debtor?s plan proposed to pay unsecured creditors a total of approximately 49% over the 60 month span of the plan. The trustee raised a number of issues (many of which are not germane to the topic here), including the propriety of the debtor?s 401(k) deductions.

The trustee argued that such large deductions into the 401(k) demonstrated a lack of the debtor?s good faith. The deductions amounted to 10% of the debtor?s gross income. If debtor stopped the high 401(k) deductions, the debtors would receive a 100% distribution over the life of the plan.

Under Section 541(b)(7), a debtor?s 401(k) contributions are not considered property of the bankruptcy estate. In addition, those amounts withheld are not considered ?disposable income? as is defined by Section 1325(b)(2). In overruling the trustee?s objections, the Court noted that the debtor was only ?taking advantage of what the law allows.?

Some might argue that this makes no sense: the debtor can pay off only half of what he owes his creditors, while at the same time, setting aside more than $50,000 over the life of the chapter 13 plan. It?s hard to imagine that the folks at MBNA had that in mind when they were lobbying Congress to change the bankruptcy laws. Yet the Court noted, this is exactly what Congress intended: ?by excluding 401(k) contributions from property of the estate and expressly removing them from the definition of disposable income under Section 1325(b)?Congress has implemented a policy of protecting and encouraging retirement savings.?

Good faith is still the rule to play by. Future chapter 13 debtors who contribute to a retirement plan may not enjoy the same result if their contributions exceed the limits permitted by their 401(k) plans. But for those folks I meet with who tell me ?all of my income goes to my bills, and I have nothing in my retirement account?, this should be welcome news.

In re Mati, Bankr.D.Mass, Chapter 13 case no. 07-13323

Full post as published by McLeod Law Offices on July 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)