Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: The University of Chicago Law School Faculty BlogCompetition and Privacy in Web 2.0 and the Cloud
I have a new draft up on SSRN. The final version will appear as part of Northwestern's Colloquy and I expect this to be incorporated in a larger project that I am working on.
Somewhat surprisingly, it appears to be the first paper on SSRN to address cloud computing, at least in those terms. I suspect that we will quickly see more of those.
As noted, this is part of a larger project, so comments are especially welcome.
Abstract:
With Web 2.0, we have once again changed how we use computers. That change has brought with it new intermediaries who sit at
the crossroads of the matching and coordination that define how we use
the Internet today. Those intermediaries - Google first and foremost -
have access to extraordinarily detailed information about their
customers. That information arises naturally from the very services
provided. We will see a similar pattern as cloud computing becomes more
important, and cloud service providers will also have available to them
a rich datastream that arises from their customer's activities.
To
date, these intermediaries have faced few limitations in how they use
the information that they see. That information can be used to improve
their core businesses - adding collective intelligence to search to
increase relevance - and to finance - through advertising backed by
rich databases that allows ads to be matched to individual customers -
virtually any content or service that can be provided through a screen.
To focus on Google as the largest player in this space, there is no
obvious limit to its scale and an advertising-supported business adds
revenue with each additional screen that is viewed.
In the
past, we have regulated intermediaries at these transactional
bottlenecks - banks, cable companies, phone companies and the like -
and limited the ways in which they can use the information that they
see. Presumably the same forces that animated those rules - fundamental
concerns about customer privacy - need to be assessed for our new
information intermediaries. In doing that, we need to be acutely aware
of how our choices influence competition. An uneven playing field -
allowing one firm to use the information that it sees while blocking
others from doing the same thing - creates market power through
limiting competition. We rarely want to do that. And privacy rules that
limit how information can be used and shared across firms will
artificially push towards greater consolidation, something which again
usually works against maintaining robust competition.
Full post as published by The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog on July 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Picker on Competition, Privacy and Web 2.0
Computing in the Cloud, January 14-15 in Princeton
Cloud computing presents real concerns over privacy issues
Market Definition, Competition, and Privacy in the Google/DoubleClick Transaction
Cloud Computing - The Next Big Thing









