ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Australian Regulatory Compliance Review

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Australian Regulatory Compliance Review

Keep your trade marks current: Gallo v Lion Nathan

ADVERTISEMENTS

In  E. & J. Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2008] FCA 934 the Federal Court rejected a claim by Gallo that Lion Nathan's trade mark "Barefoot" in relation to a beer infringed its trade mark "Barefoot" in relation to wine.

Not only did Gallo fail to stop Lion Nathan, Lion Nathan succeeded in its counter-claim that Gallo's trade mark be removed for non-use.

A detailed analysis of the case is made by Nicholas Weston here.

Full post as published by Australian Regulatory Compliance Review on July 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)