Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Australian Regulatory Compliance ReviewKeep your trade marks current: Gallo v Lion Nathan
In E. & J. Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2008] FCA 934 the Federal Court rejected a claim by Gallo that Lion Nathan's trade mark "Barefoot" in relation to a beer infringed its trade mark "Barefoot" in relation to wine.
Not only did Gallo fail to stop Lion Nathan, Lion Nathan succeeded in its counter-claim that Gallo's trade mark be removed for non-use.
A detailed analysis of the case is made by Nicholas Weston here.
Full post as published by Australian Regulatory Compliance Review on July 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Inmate Possessions
Washington Department of Corrections agrees to pay current and former inmates $75 each for donating or destroying personal property.
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.

New Trade Marks Office practice to World and Land marks
Blawg of the Day -- Australian Trade Marks Law Blog
Examination of Three-dimensional Marks by Wang Ze








