Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael Geist61 Reforms to C-61, Day 3: Format Shifting Subject to Digital Lock Provision
By Michael Geist
ADVERTISEMENTS
Yesterday's reform focused on one key limitation in the format shifting provision, namely the odd limitation of the format shifting provision to videocassettess. Today's reform picks up on what will be a consistent theme throughout this series - the subordination of any consumer rights to the digital lock. Indeed, virtually all the so-called rights in Bill C-61 come with a big asterisk since the content distributor or creators (typically distributor) gets to determine whether Canadians can actually take advantage of these new rights. If the distributor or creator chooses to impose a digital lock on their song, video, photograph, book, or other content, the consumer rights disappear. This is in marked contrast to other user rights in the Copyright Act that set limits on what users can do (it is fair dealing, not free dealing), but do not leave absolute control in the hands of the distributor or creator.Industry Minister Jim Prentice only occassionally acknowledges this limitation. For example, in his recent Kingston Whig-Standard letter to the editor, he noted that
Our government is the first to allow Canadians to record their TV and radio shows to enjoy at different times - without infringing copyright. Our reform will also permit consumers to copy music onto devices such as MP3 players, and to copy books, newspapers, videos and photos into different formats.
Yet he failed to admit that these new rights are subject to the core limitation that any circumvention of a digital lock disqualifies the format shifting. He also fails to note that his government is the first to restrict Canadians in such an absolute manner. The necessary reform here is the removal of Section 29.21(c) which may make these new rights largely ineffective in the digital world.
Full post as published by Michael Geist on June 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Apple Inc.
allegedly maintained an illegal monopoly on the digital music market.
Oil and Gas
industry workers allegedly subject to serious accident injury from hazardous conditions.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CIPPICs Video on Time and Format Shifting in Canada
Put Another Copyright Act on the Barbie, Mate
Copying photos and films for private use - Submissions Invited
Attorneys' Fee Awards in California III: More Attorney Fee Shifting Statutes








