ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Green Grasso? NY High Court Affirms Ruling Favoring Former NYSE Chief

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

grassoWhy is Dick Grasso smiling? Possibly because earlier today he inched closer to being able to retain at least a portion of his $187 million compensation package, granted to him by his former employer, the New York Stock Exchange. The New York State Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling from last year that threw out several key parts of New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s case over the package. Click here for the WSJ story, here for the decision.

The high court affirmed a split decision finding that the attorney general’s office “does not have the authority” to bring major parts of its case under the state’s not-for-profit law.

In a 3-2 decision in May 2007, a court in the state’s appellate division threw out four of six causes of action against Mr. Grasso. It said the attorney general’s office could bring two causes of action — unlawful transfer of corporate assets and breach of fiduciary duty. Those statutory claims are pending.

“The settlement value is greatly reduced” because of today’s decision, says John Coffee, a law professor at Columbia University. “For Cuomo, I’m not sure he’d want to take the risk to go to trial in a case where he needs to make a high showing and he could be embarrassed by losing.”

Coffee thinks the ruling takes away some of his office’s power to bring such cases. So, in his opinion, Cuomo should try to settle this case quickly and spend more of his time pushing the legislature to give his office more authority in policing not-for-profit institutions in New York. Cuomo’s office didn’t immediately comment.

“A side-by-side comparison of the challenged claims and the statutory claims reveals that the attorney general has crafted four causes of action with a lower burden of proof than that specified by the statute, overriding the fault-based scheme codified by the Legislature and thus reaching beyond the bounds of the attorney general’s authority,” the Court of Appeals said Wednesday.

The state attorney general’s office, under then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, sued Grasso in 2004, alleging his pay was excessive for a not-for-profit corporation. Grasso, who left the NYSE in 2003 amid turmoil over his pay, has denied wrongdoing. The Big Board has since become a publicly traded for-profit company, NYSE Euronext Inc.

Mark Zauderer, a lawyer for Grasso, declined comment Wednesday.

Photo: AP

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on June 25, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0179 secs (new cache)