ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Law Blog Obituary: George Carlin, a ?Footnote in American History?

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

carlin_art_200v_20080623102401.jpg

George Carlin at the Wheeler Opera House in Aspen, Colo., Feb. 28, 2007. (Credit: Associated Press)

By now you’ve probably heard the news of George Carlin’s passing. The famously irreverent comedian and actor died of heart failure yesterday in Santa Monica. He was 71. Here are stories from the NYT and LAT.

Like many American children, the LB was exposed to Carlin’s comedy at a young age. But we didn’t come to understand his role in U.S. legal history until a mass media class in law school, when we read FCC v. Pacifica, the 1978 Scotus case in which the Court decided that FCC sanctions could be invoked against a radio broadcast of words dealing with sex and execration, even if those words aren’t obscene.

The case arose out of a Carlin monologue, played at 2:00 p.m. on a weekday afternoon by Pacifica’s FM licensee in New York, that discussed at length the words s*** and f***. In upholding the constitutionality of the sanctions, Justice Stevens — joined by Rehnquist, Powell, Blackmun and Burger — wrote: “Patently offensive, indecent material presented over the airwaves confronts the citizen, not only in public, but also in the privacy of the home, where the individual’s right to be left alone plainly outweighs the First Amendment rights of an intruder.”

In conclusion, Stevens emphasized the narrowness of the holding. “As Mr. Justice Sutherland wrote [in Euclid v. Amber Realty], a ‘nuisance may be merely a right thing in the wrong place, — like a pig in the parlor instead of the barnyard’ . . . We simply hold that when the Commission finds that a pig has entered the parlor, the exercise of its regulatory power does not depend on proof that the pig is obscene.”

Of the ruling, Carlin recently told the AP, “So my name is a footnote in American history, which I’m perversely kind of proud of.”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on June 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)