Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Richmond Virginia Personal Injury LawyerAttacking Workplace Age Discrimination Head-On
By Zev Antell
Age discrimination in the work place is nothing new. Especially in the context of hiring and firing, workplace age discrimination can be described as near ubiquitous. Employers routinely lay off elder workers in far greater numbers than their younger colleagues. Sadly, somewhat less common is an employer being held accountable for their actions. Under the ADEA (Age Discrimination in Employment Act) employers are prohibited from firing and hiring based on discriminatory age criteria.
The reasons an employer may seek out a younger workforce are many. Sometimes they believe that by bringing in "new blood" they can improve overall company performance. Others might seek to "go younger" for simple economics; younger employees tend to be less experienced and therefore will accept less money. Regardless of the employer's motivation, the practice is illegal if done with a discriminatory intent. The ADEA provides significant ammunition to fight these practices.
When an older employee is laid off or fired, whatever the purported reason, they owe it to themselves to at least consider the possibility that it wasn't their "performance," or the need to eliminate "redundancies," or any other workplace jargon, that led to their demise. The fact is, legitimate age discrimination claims can be extremely successful. A New Jersey jury recently awarded nearly $11 million dollars to a group of terminated older employees. Of that award, $10 million dollars came in the form of punitive damages. In levying such a large punitive award, it appears the jury found the employer's conduct to be particularly egregious. Only when employers fully understand that they will be held accountable are they likely to treat older employees in a fair fashion.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Zev AntellFull post as published by Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer on June 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Michelin hit with $11.9M verdict for fatal head on crash
Michelin Settles Lawsuit for $11.6 Million
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Jury Awards $1,642,475 in Workplace Electrocution Lawsuit
Workplace Electrocution Lawsuit Jury Awards $1,642,475
Sexual Harassment
(in the workplace)
Workers Compensation
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store and Restaurant pays waitress $900,000 settlement after workplace injury.
Drive Through Discrimination
Jack-in-the Box pays undisclosed racial discrimination settlement to two customers.

Statements from Workplace Discrimination Hearing Available
Workplace Religious Freedom Act Debated
Behavioral Analyses of Workplace Discrimination
N.J. Supreme Court Says Religious Slurs Create a Hostile Workplace
Lack of Accommodation for Well-Endowed Prison Guard Not Sex Discrimination
FRC: ENDA the Line for Workplace Protections







