Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Trial Lawyer Resource Center
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Trial Lawyer Resource CenterShould You Bring Your Expert Witnesses Live to Trial?
There is no question that, all other things being equal, live witnesses are more interesting than videotaped depositions. It is simply more interesting to connect with an actual human being than it is with a figure on a videotape. But all things are not always equal. Often, it makes more sense to offer witnesses by videotape in personal injury cases. This blog post offers a few things to consider in the decision making process that may weigh in favor of bringing your expert by videotape.
Some expert witnesses make a better appearance on a video than they do testifying live at trial. This is true for a lot of reasons. The doctor might seem more “independent” in his office with his lab coat on than coming to trial to testify on behalf of the client. Also, the truth is that some witnesses are unattractive in mannerism or appearance and are more palatable on video where some unattractive qualities can be muted somewhat.
Some experts also charge so much money for live testimony that it makes it untenable to bring that expert live given the size of the case. If you have an auto accident case that you believe is worth less than $50,000, it becomes very difficult to justify to the client paying an expert $8,000 to testify live at trial. Even if the lawyer is fronting the money for the experts, it comes out of the client’s pocket at the end of the day (assuming the case is successful).
In some trials where scheduling of witnesses is an issue and you have a judge who is going to demand to move the trial along, it is also sometimes helpful to have a videotape because of the flexibility it provides in terms of plugging in the right witnesses at the right time during the trial. This is particularly true of those witnesses where you need their testimony in evidence, but the issues to which they speak are not particularly issues of great contention.
Finally, if you think the trial testimony is going to be contentious in terms of what testimony will be allowed and you fear this dispute may look unfavorably on you or your client, a videotaped deposition in a viable solution. This way, you can air your disputes with the defense lawyer, and either edit the tape accordingly, or, as is more customary in the real world, simply fast forward though the objections.
Again, all things being equal, a live witness is a better witness. But these choices should be made in each individual case. Sometimes, the best and easiest thing for your client is to videotape the deposition of one or all of your expert witnesses.
Full post as published by Trial Lawyer Resource Center on January 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Institutionalized Medicaid Recipients
Sue For Right To Choose Where They Live
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA
Dollar Tree Stores Hourly Employees Bring Class Action
Dollar Tree Stores Hourly Employees Bring Class Action
Parents Bring Federal Lawsuit After Tainted Baby Formula Injures Newborn
Parents Bring Federal Lawsuit After Tainted Baby Formula Injures Newborn
LA Wildfires
Bring Widespread Destruction

Should You Bring Your Expert Witnesses Live to Trial
"Should You Bring Your Expert Witnesses Live to Trial"
Expert Witnesses, Reasonableness of Conduct and Other Business/Law/Financial Issues.
Testimony of Expert Witness for Hamburg Almost Leads to a Mistrial
Hot Tubbing: Old Wine in New Bottles for Expert Witnesses
Are You Really an "Expert Witness"








