ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Politics

: The Gavel

House Passes Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act

By Jesse Lee

ADVERTISEMENTS

The House has just passed the Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act, H.R. 5781 by a vote of 278-146. This legislation will help families by providing four weeks of paid parental leave to federal and congressional employees. In addition to the four weeks, employees will also be allowed to use any accrued annual or sick leave for parental leave. Unlike current law, employees using their sick leave for parental leave will not need to demonstrate a medical need for the leave. The bill also authorizes the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to extend the parental leave period to up to eight weeks. Enactment of this measure will ensure that the federal government, as an employer, is providing the type of benefits offered to government workers in other industrialized countries. This family friendly measure will also have a positive impact on the ability of the federal government to attract and retain a highly qualified workforce.

Learn more in our current legislation section >>

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14), the primary sponsor of the bill, spoke in favor:

Rep. Maloney: “This is the 21st Century. Both the father and the mother have to work. And this is an important family-friendly, family-value legislation. How many times have we heard the opposite friends on the opposite side of the aisle talk about family values? Well, today we are going to have an opportunity to actually vote and do something to help families.”

Rep. Henry Waxman, Chairman of the Oversight Committee, spoke in favor:

Rep. Waxman: “There they go again, coming up with a gimmick because they don’t want the underlying bill. If they don’t want the underlying bill, let them vote no. But what they’ve offered instead is a motion to recommit promptly which kills the bill. So I urge my colleagues who believe that parents ought to be able to bond with their children and have a paid family leave on the birth of a child or the adoption of a newborn that they vote against this motion to recommit.”

Full post as published by The Gavel on June 19, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)