Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentMA: Collateral estoppel requires mutuality of parties; codefendant's win of his suppression hearing does not preclude prosecution
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Collateral estoppel in criminal cases requires mutuality of parties. Here, the codefendant's win of his suppression hearing that the state did not appeal does not preclude the prosecution from attempting to use the evidence against the defendant. While Massachusetts cases do suggest that mutuality is not required, the Supreme Judicial Court concludes that those cases do not apply to suppression hearings. One purpose of collateral estoppel, conserving judicial resources, is not served by nonmutu read more
Full post as published by Fourth Amendment on June 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Circuit Split Over Whether Court Must Consider Mistried Counts in Collateral Estoppel Analysis
Alabama Supreme Court can only review grounds accepted on certiorari
CAFC: Notice Must Be Provided For JMOL When Factual Disputes Exist
Judiciary Hearing on Voter Suppression








