Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"East Coast panel to oversee misconduct probe of California Judge Alex Kozinski"

"East Coast panel to oversee misconduct probe of California Judge Alex Kozinski": Scott Glover of The Los Angeles Times has this news update.

The Associated Press reports that "Judge's wife derides media on Web site story."

This evening's broadcast of NPR's "All Things Considered" contained an audio segment entitled "Judges and Conflicts of Interest" (RealPlayer required).

And Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld has an article headlined "Federal judge lands in hot water over explicit images on Web site; Judge in L.A. recuses himself from obscenity trial, asks court officials to investigate him" in which I am quoted.

Elsewhere, at Wired's "Threat Level" blog, Ryan Singel has a post titled "Wiretap Ruling Dies Slow Death As Congress Moves Towards Telecom Amnesty" that begins, "Somewhere on the hard drive of a judge from the 9th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court there likely lives a file that's way more interesting than the tasteless, porn videos found on the personal website of the circuit's chief judge Alex Kozinski. Somewhere there's an opinion from three judges that rules whether or not citizens can sue AT&T for violations of federal wiretapping law, or whether the government's invocation of national security trumps the right to seek redress."

At Townhall.com, Justin Hart has an essay entitled "Judging Pornography."

And at WorldNetDaily, Joseph Farah has an essay entitled "Prosecute the perv judge."

Full post as published by How Appealing on June 16, 2008 (boomark / email).