Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> HealthBlawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: HealthBlawgMS 1.20: Has the Joint Commission comes to its senses on medical staff bylaws?
By David Harlow
Let's not break out the bubbly quite yet, but this week the Joint Commission (the organization formerly known as JCAHO) has slowed down the process of implementing a revised MS 1.20. This standard would otherwise have become effective July 1, 2009. In its current form, the proposed revision would require that (1) all substantive provisions of medical staff governing documents be included in the medical staff bylaws, (2) the bylaws -- and all other governing documents (credentialing policies, manuals, etc.) be adopted by the entire medical staff membership (i.e., not just the Medical Executive Committee, or MEC) and (3) there be some mechanism for the full medical staff to overturn an action taken by the MEC.
In theory, this makes the work of the MEC more transparent; in practice, this revised standard, if implemented, could provide for standoffs between different factions of a hospital's medical staff (e.g., MEC insiders vs. outsiders), and would require a very cumbersome process for amending any substantive policy.
If an MEC wanted to, it could limit MEC circumvention of the full medical staff's wishes even without the MS 1.20 revision, e.g., by establishing MEC-recommended criteria for medical staff votes on these things. For example, the MEC could propose a bylaw that says the MEC will bring a medical staff issue to the hospital governing board if 2/3 of medical staff asks it to (by vote or petition).
Given today's ever-shifting health care environment, the process requirements that would be imposed by revised MS 1.20 could hobble a health system working to position itself to better advantage within its market, eventually harming the interests of the medical staff membership they were apparently intended to protect.
These revisions have been about five years in the making, and it's unfortunate that they still seem to be so far off the mark.
-- David Harlow
Full post as published by HealthBlawg on June 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 2
Training, Healthcare, and Death Benefits
Sunwest Management Inc.
allegedly misled residents about staff and daily care.
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
Developer Investment
Raffaello Follieri agrees to $12 million joint venture settlement.
Joint Venture
Gallaher Group agrees to pay Reynolds American $387 million contract dispute settlement.
Sun Mar Health Care Inc.
allegedly misrepresented nursing staff levels and training to elderly residents.
Medical Technology
Ventana Medical Systems Inc. pays CytoLogix Corp. $49 million patent infringement settlement.

Q & A; Can a Condo Board Change the Bylaws
Cal. Appeals Court Holds Medical Staff Retroactive Board Certification Rule Unfair
Joint Tax Committee to Rethink Tax Expenditure Analysis









