Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IP ADR Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IP ADR BlogIP ADR: Pool Patents for Protection, Prevention and Profit
By Les Weinstein, Michael Young, John Leo Wagner, Eric van Ginkel, and Victoria Pynchon
Check out this week's Harvard Business School Working Knowledge article: Monetizing IP: The Executive's Challenge here.
As patent protection becomes more and more costly and less and less certain, innovators are pursuing collaborative agreements to prevent disputes from arising in the first instance. None of the suggestions contained in this article is a cure-all, but many are enterprising solutions to help companies avoid litigation in the first instance.
In a patent pool, firms blend their patents with those of other firms. These pools allow users to access a number of firms' patents simultaneously, thereby avoiding the "patent thicket." In many cases, the pooling agreements also specify the pricing schedule in the agreement that establishes the pool, assuring that no party attempts to extract very high fees or to increase its fees after users are locked in.
Patent pools date back as far as the 1850s but have proliferated in recent years. Goods covered by patent pools totaled at least $100 billion in the United States in 2000, while multiple standard-setting bodies today cover virtually every high-technology product. Moreover, the scope of these activities is likely to grow in future years. In many industries, leaders have expressed frustration about the proliferation of patent thickets—the large number of overlapping awards—and the ensuing rise of costly and time-consuming litigation. In many cases, technology sharing has been proposed as a remedy.
Full post as published by IP ADR Blog on June 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Rent Controlled Apartments
Landlord to pay $10 million settlement after forcing out low income tenants and then selling the buildings for a profit.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Hutchinson Oil
Over $75,000 settlement reached in consumer protection lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Jorda on : Exploitation of the Overlap Between Patents and Trade Secrets is Paramount
CSIR Looks to Profit from Patents Stock
Economic Crisis Sends IP Owners (And Their Lawyers) Looking For Protection
A Word of Caution: Foreclosure Prevention Counselors
Jorda on: The Complementariness of Patents and Trade Secrets









