Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Energy Law Blogs -> Energy Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Energy Law
: Energy Legal BlogFirst NERC Penalty Notices Suggest Focus on Enforcement
By Kristin McKeown
On June 4, 2008, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation made its first public announcement of its Notices of Penalty when it filed at FERC the first batch of proposed penalties for reliability standard violations. Most Notices of Penalty filed with FERC were for a zero penalty amount, however, Baltimore Gas & Electric and MidAmerican Energy Company received penalties of $180,000 and $75,000, respectively, for violations of the Transmission Vegetation Management Standard, FAC-003-1. Violations of the Transmission Vegetation Management Standard were one of the major causes of the 2003 Blackout and an area where Regional Entities and NERC clearly intend to keep a watchful eye to ensure companies' compliance. Violations of reliability standards can result in penalties of up to $1 million per day per violation.
The most common violations have been violations of the sabotage reporting requirements set forth in CIP-001-1, followed by violations of other standards that address normal operations planning, maintenance of generation and transmission protection systems, and facility ratings methodology. Many of the Notices of Penalty characterize violations as "documentation" issues because while many companies may have procedures in place, Regional Entities and NERC have found their documentation of such procedures to be lacking. The Notices of Penalty put an emphasis on the actions taken by companies to ensure reliability going forward, including the completion of Mitigation Plans to remedy violations and prevent future violations. The Regional Entities have discovered violations through spot checks, self certifications, self reports, and compliance audits.
So far, NERC has made zero penalty amount determinations based on the presence of most, if not all, of the following eight factors: (1) the violation was a documentation issue, or was characterized as minor under the circumstances; (2) no system disturbance occurred as a result of the violation and the violation did not jeopardize bulk power system reliability; (3) the violation occurred prior to 1/08; (4) the violations are the first incidence of violation for the registered entity; (5) the registered entity's cooperation with the regional entity; (6) immediate action to mitigate; (7) the violation was mitigated in accordance with the mitigation plan; and (8) the registered entity's actions ensured reliability.
Full post as published by Energy Legal Blog on June 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Ford Focus
Consumer Class Action Settles for Cash Refunds
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
Faulty Homes
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc. pays HUD $75,000 civil penalty for defective construction.
PhotoCop Tickets
Minneapolis to pay $2.6 million settlement in traffic enforcement lawsuit.
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 42: ISP Notice and Notice - No Penalty for False Notices
Kansas Death Penalty Focus blog shuts down (for now)
Clemency Urged in Mississippi Case
Raskolnikov: Beyond Deterrence: Targeting Tax Enforcement with a Penalty Default







