ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Caveat Emptor

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: Caveat Emptor

Mandatory binding arbitration sucks (say 81% of Americans)

By Sam Glover

ADVERTISEMENTS

81% of Americans polled in a recent study commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce disapproved of mandatory binding arbitration. This is the corporation-friendly, tie-your-hands arbitration that is written into most of the consumer contracts we sign every day for credit cards, cell phones, etc.

So maybe it is time for Congress to get going and pass the Arbitration Fairness Act, which has apparently been languishing in the Senate since last December.

Why is it languishing? Because mandatory binding arbitration is big business for arbitration companies like the National Arbitration Forum and the American Arbitration Association, and for collection agencies like Wolpoff & Abramson, who bring tens of thousands of arbitrations each year.

Mandatory binding arbitration is not the cost-efficient arbitration that companies and consumers mutually agree on after a dispute arises. This elective arbitration is good, as long as everyone agrees to it.

But look for the National Arbitration Association and the American Arbitration Association to talk only about the positives of arbitration. Read carefully. Yes, many people support arbitration. It can be a very cost-effective alternative to the court system. But only when it is a real choice.

It can also be prohibitively expensive for the consumer. And it usually is where mandatory binding arbitration is forced on the consumer.

Mandatory binding arbitration is not a choice. It ties consumers’ hands in exactly those cases that may be better heard by a court, and subtracts many of the protections of the court system (like meaningful recourse if a defendant is never even served with a complaint). That, obviously, is why corporations love it.

Time to write your congressperson and urge them to put some fairness back into arbitration.

New Poll: Americans Say “No Thanks” To Binding Arbitration [Consumer Law & Policy Blog]

Full post as published by Caveat Emptor on May 27, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)