Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyTwo sentence reversals from the Sixth Circuit
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
As detailed at SCOTUSblog, the Justices returned from their barbeques without anything tasty for sentencing fans. Fortunately, the Sixth Circuit grilled up some sentences this morning in two opinion. Here are the basics as set forth each opinion's opening paragraphs:
US v. Penson, No. 06-3419 (6th Cir. May 27, 2008) (available here):The instant case presents this court with a particularly troubling example of a procedurally unreasonable sentence that also exceeds the statutory-maximum sentence. George Washington Penson, III (?Penson?) appeals his sentence and the judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. For the reasons explained below, we VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for resentencing...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on May 27, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

You Can't Say Seven Words on the Internet
Sixth Circuit Rejects Daubert Challenge and Affirms Class Certification
NEWS: 2008 Sixth Circuit Judicial Conf. on May 7-10, 2008, Chattanooga, TN
Sixth Circuit Holds that Failure to Accommodate Can Be Constructive Discharge








