Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersMiranda in Tenth Circuit
By Randall Hodgkinson
ADVERTISEMENTS
J. Lance Hopkins won in U.S. v. Revels, No. 06-5223 (10th Cir. Dec. 20, 2007), successfully defending an Oklahoma federal district court's Miranda suppression order in a government interlocutlory appeal. Here is coverage from Decision of the Day Blog. The Tenth Circuit reviewed the undisputed facts surrounding the execution of a state search warrant and Revels' subsquent questioning:we conclude that a reasonable person in Revels? position would have considered herself under a degree of restraint equivalent to formal arrest and that officers should have extended Miranda advisements prior to their questioning. The undisputed facts demonstrate that the officers? actions created the type of coercive environment that Miranda was designed to address.
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on December 21, 2007 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Upcoming Tenth Circuit Oral Arguments
Third time's (almost) the charm in Tenth Circuit sentencing case
"The governments argument that it honored its promises reeks of the lamp."
Thoughtful and nuanced discussion of procedural reasonableness from Tenth Circuit
Tenth Circuit Holds that Defense of Title VII Claim Falls under Participation Clause








