ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Barbie Battles Bratz as Toy Makers Head to Trial

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

barbiebratzWas the designer of Bratz dolls — a $500 million per year franchise that’s stolen much of Barbie’s marketshare — still an employee of Mattel when he dreamed up the pouty-lipped dolls beloved by tweenage girls?

That issue, among others, will take center-stage next Tuesday when Mattel, the maker of Barbie, heads to trial in California federal court to square off against closely held MGA Entertainment, the maker of Bratz. The WSJ’s Nick Casey has penned a scintillating walk-up to the trial, which you can find here, along with some cool video reporting.

Mattel, represented by Quinn Emmanuel’s John Quinn, accuses MGA of essentially stealing the idea for Bratz dolls, and is trying to seize ownership of the Bratz line. MGA, rep’d by Skadden’s Tom Nolan, denies wrongdoing, and accuses Mattel in a separate suit of copying Bratz.

Here’s what happened, according to Casey’s story: In 1998, designer Carter Bryant left Mattel and moved back to his parents’ home, at which point he says he had a eureka moment involving the fashions and hair styles of teenagers that led to the Bratz sketches.

In 1999, Bryant signed a new contract with Mattel to design clothes for the Barbie lines. In 2000, Bryant took a vacation day from Mattel to discuss the doll idea with MGA, then jumped ship to MGA and got the Bratz project off the ground. In 2002, Mattel’s CEO received an anonymous letter saying Bryant had created Bratz while at Mattel. In 2004, Mattel hired PIs to spy on one of its own execs who it suspected of leaking secrets. Later that year, Mattel filed a suit against Bryant, accusing him of dreaming up the hit doll while on Mattel’s payroll.

In 2005, MGA counter-sued, claiming Mattel altered the design of its own dolls to more closely resemble the Bratz line and used its sway with retailers to stifle competition. In 2006, Mattel expanded its suit to include MGA and its CEO, Isaac Larian. Bryant, represented separately by John Keker, the same lawyer who represented Dickie Scruggs, agreed to a confidential settlement with Mattel — leaving Mattel and MGA to duke it out. (Mattel didn’t disclose the terms of its settlement with Bryant, but said the agreement will bolster its case; MGA says its position isn’t undermined.)

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on May 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)