Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comBarbie Battles Bratz as Toy Makers Head to Trial
By Dan Slater
Was the designer of Bratz dolls — a $500 million per year franchise that’s stolen much of Barbie’s marketshare — still an employee of Mattel when he dreamed up the pouty-lipped dolls beloved by tweenage girls?
That issue, among others, will take center-stage next Tuesday when Mattel, the maker of Barbie, heads to trial in California federal court to square off against closely held MGA Entertainment, the maker of Bratz. The WSJ’s Nick Casey has penned a scintillating walk-up to the trial, which you can find here, along with some cool video reporting.
Mattel, represented by Quinn Emmanuel’s John Quinn, accuses MGA of essentially stealing the idea for Bratz dolls, and is trying to seize ownership of the Bratz line. MGA, rep’d by Skadden’s Tom Nolan, denies wrongdoing, and accuses Mattel in a separate suit of copying Bratz.
Here’s what happened, according to Casey’s story: In 1998, designer Carter Bryant left Mattel and moved back to his parents’ home, at which point he says he had a eureka moment involving the fashions and hair styles of teenagers that led to the Bratz sketches.
In 1999, Bryant signed a new contract with Mattel to design clothes for the Barbie lines. In 2000, Bryant took a vacation day from Mattel to discuss the doll idea with MGA, then jumped ship to MGA and got the Bratz project off the ground. In 2002, Mattel’s CEO received an anonymous letter saying Bryant had created Bratz while at Mattel. In 2004, Mattel hired PIs to spy on one of its own execs who it suspected of leaking secrets. Later that year, Mattel filed a suit against Bryant, accusing him of dreaming up the hit doll while on Mattel’s payroll.
In 2005, MGA counter-sued, claiming Mattel altered the design of its own dolls to more closely resemble the Bratz line and used its sway with retailers to stifle competition. In 2006, Mattel expanded its suit to include MGA and its CEO, Isaac Larian. Bryant, represented separately by John Keker, the same lawyer who represented Dickie Scruggs, agreed to a confidential settlement with Mattel — leaving Mattel and MGA to duke it out. (Mattel didn’t disclose the terms of its settlement with Bryant, but said the agreement will bolster its case; MGA says its position isn’t undermined.)
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on May 23, 2008 (boomark / email).
Michelin hit with $11.9M verdict for fatal head on crash
Michelin Settles Lawsuit for $11.6 Million
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

You Go Girl: Barbie Prevails Over the Bratz Girls in Copyright Infringement Case
Bratz success caught by barbie-d wire
Barbie defeats Bratz in $100m copyright lawsuit$
It Must Have Been a Jury of 8-Year-Old Boys








