Academic

Faith Based Prisoner Re-entry

By Dan Filler

Alabama has a problem.  Its prison system releases 11,000 prisoners each year and there's no money to help them with the challenges of re-entry.  If you're a governor who has already been severely chastised once over proposed tax increases, how do you solve this problem?  Bob Riley has an idea: ask churches to provide the services.  This, according to the Birmingham News:

Leaders from churches and charitable groups were asked to provide a wide range of services to former inmates, including employment assistance, housing, clothing, health care and cash.... "If we can motivate the faith-based community in the state the way we do during an emergency, then we can make a difference," Riley said.. Bill Johnson, director of the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs, said the state releases 11,000 inmates a year and isn't capable of providing the services necessary to help them readjust. Even if the state had the funds, such programs aren't popular with taxpayers, he said.   The state will provide no direct funds to the program, called the Community Partnership for Recovery and Re-entry, but will coordinate the efforts of the churches and other volunteer groups.   "We're admitting we can't solve the problem," Johnson said.  At a meeting that vacillated between policy seminar and revival, state officials outlined their needs to religious leaders, who said they view the program as an opportunity to spread the word of God.

I suppose the state should be commended for recognizing, at the very least, that such transition programs are essential.  But outsourcing them to churches is at best a band-aid.  And here (unlike in the national Faith Based Initiative conversation), religious leaders are quite explicit that their interest in these programs is tied to an opportunity to evangelize. 

As unpopular as these programs may be, policy makers must recognize that the cost of (effective and non-criminogenic) incarceration includes pricey re-entry assistance.  Without it, the state will have to bear the expense of sky-high recidivism rates.  In my view, if you can't afford re-entry, you can't afford prisons. 

Full post as published by The Faculty Lounge on May 21, 2008 (boomark / email).