Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Appellate Law and Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Appellate Law and PracticeDC Circuit: GS-9s can torture and interfere with religion much as they want
By S. COTUS
The DC Circuit holds that former GTMO detainees can?t sue the government. Nobody really expected the DC Circuit to rule otherwise, so I don?t think there is much to report on here. But, it is sort of funny to watch their acrobatics over the RFRA claims. In this case, the DC Circuit figured that the GTMO detainees are not ?persons? under the RFRA, because although they were brought to GTMO against their will they don?t have enough a connection with the place, and then quoted Johnson v. Eisentrager. But, again, it isn?t as if the DC Circuit really wants to take these claims too seriously, anyway, and it is just a weigh station before petitioning for cert., and then waiting until a new president tries to fix this mess. Tnx. SCOTUSblog. (By the way, if I thought that the DC Circuit was taking the Westfall Act issue and the Bivens issue seriously, I would have some thoughts on it, but they are not. So, I am keeping it to myself.) Now, of course, it remains to be seen whether detainees will start filing administrative claims under the FTCA.
DotD comments here on all the DC Cirucit's practice of deference to the government.
Full post as published by Appellate Law and Practice on January 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Walt Disney
alleging a Sikh American applied for a job with Disney but was told he did not have the "Disney look" - apparently referring to his beard and turban, which is required by his religion.

Torture But Not That Bad For Torture
"Torture Memo" Author Detained in Oakland
9th Circuit Certifies Questions to California Supreme Court in Boy Scouts Lease Case
On Scalia and Religion vs. Non-Religion









