Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatEnercon appeal dismissed
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
This morning the Court of First Instance (CFI) of the European Communities dismissed the appeal in Case T?329/06, Enercon GmbH v OHIM. This decision is so far available only in French and German.So far as the IPKat can tell, this was an application to register as a Community trade mark a word sign consisting solely of the letter 'E' for various products relating to the generation of energy in the form of electricity in Classes 7, 9 and 19. He thinks the application was refused for lack of distinctive character and for its descriptive nature ("e" being an abbreviation of obvious application in this commercial sector). It seems that the Board of Appeal and the CFI agreed.
The IPKat wonders if one of his more linguistically talented readers could tell him a little more.
Click here for coverage of Rechtssache T?71/06 Enercon GmbH v OHIM, in which Enercon applied to register as a Community trade mark a shape consisting of an American football-shaped wind turbine.
Full post as published by IPKat on May 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
US Army Corps of Engineers
Class action dismissed for allegedly failing to protect New Orleans from the levee breach.
False Arrest
City of Greer pays $50,000 settlement after imprisoning a woman whose charges had been dismissed years earlier.

Alfresco quadrant appeal dismissed
Appeal Fron Non-Final Order Dismissed
Untimely notice of appeal requires dismissal of appeal
Rule 54(b) certification improper, so appeal is dismissed
New opinion on timing of notice of appeal: Adaimy v. Ruhl







