ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer

Vioxx Has $32 Million Award Overturned

By Eddie Farah

ADVERTISEMENTS

It was a huge win for a victim of Vioxx.  In 2001, Leonel Garza suffered a fatal heart attack after a month on the painkiller Vioxx. 

In 2006, his widow was awarded a $32 million judgment by a Texas jury. But leave it to the caps on punitive awards to have that reduced to $8.73.  

Then on Wednesday, an appeals court threw out that award too. The court said that Mrs. Garza didn't prove that her husband's pre-existing conditions didn't cause his heart attack.  He had a heart condition and had suffered a previous heart attack.

Lawyers for Mrs. Garza are hoping to take the issue to the Texas Supreme Court. They say they'll prove that Vioxx did not have to be the sole cause of Mr. Garza's heart attack. There could be other complicating conditions that Vioxx contributed to. 

Drug maker Merck has now lost four cases and won 13.  And it have morer litigation ahead over the recalled painkiller.  Last November, Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle about 27,000 lawsuits filed by people or their survivors who said that Vioxx caused heart attacks and strokes.

Every year, thousands of people are seriously injured as a result of using prescription drugs or over-the-counter medications they believed to be safe. The FDA acts less like a regulatory agency and more like an approval agency. Even it admits it cannot possible verify the safety of all drugs. It can try to address the efficacy, but that is based on what data the company decides to share.

For the FDA to be seen as the final approval stamp that wipes out a person's ability to go to court under federal preemption, is nonsense at best and a travesty on our democratic principles. Think what this woman must go through just to have her day in court. Sadly, she may never get a chance.

 

 

 

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Eddie Farah

Full post as published by Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer on May 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0161 secs (new cache)