Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> court-o-rama.org
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: court-o-rama.orgThe History of Everything! Judicial Selection in Ohio
By Anne Skove, Esq.
Following Charles Gibson (in talking head form) at yesterday's forum was UC Law professor Michael Solimine (live and in person!).
Solimine has read and given more thought to the Ohio constitutional conventions than most people, claiming "It's not as boring as it sounds!" (To the assembly of wonks, it probably did not sound boring at all!)
He is the author of The False Promise of Judicial Elections in Ohio, Capital University Law Review (2001). This article and his presentation outline the history of judicial selection in Ohio.
In the beginning...the legislature appointed judges. In our opinion, this is the worst of all possible methods! But we weren't around then, so nobody asked us. By 1851, though, the Ohio constitutional convention switched to elected judges.
Reasons for the switch are unclear, even to Solimine. He guesses that it was a cultural shift influenced by Jacksonian populism. The convention minutes cover procedure, logistics, but no clues as to why. (Our view: because it makes sense, particularly at the time. The court system was more developed by that point, people had a greater understanding of what it meant to live in a democracy, and there were no televisions.)
At the 1912 constitutional convention it was decided that elections should be nonpartisan.
Thus, Ohio's system of judicial selection was created. And not too many people today are saying "and it was good." Rather, they're saying, "hunh?" In fact, most people don't know who they're electing, give odd reasons (gender, name recognition, etc.) for their choice, or just stay home. Voters are outrageously uninformed about judicial candidates. Most (50-75%) judges run unopposed. See Lawrence Baum, Judicial Elections and Judicial Independence: The Voter's Perspective, Ohio State Law Journal (2003).
In Solimine's mind, this system amounts to an election "in name only." If the goal is to get good judges, elections miss the mark. The best system, thinks Solimine, is merit selection (aka the Missouri Plan).
Next: Common Cause Ohio follows the money!
Full post as published by court-o-rama.org on May 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
Ohio Health Centers
Ohio Health Centers Sued for Improper Billing
Toyota Recalls 3.8 million vehicles
Biggest Toyota Recall in History
Tainted Spinach
Family awarded settlement after two children became very ill after eating Natural Selection Foods spinach.
Ohio Drinking Water
Contaminated with Acid
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
Merrill Lynch
Agrees a $475 Million Settlement with Ohio Teachers

Nevada Sup. Ct. gives details on judicial selection
JUDICIARY: "Courts - Tennessee's "Missouri plan" for judicial selection expires" FROM ILB
"State Judicial Selection: Once More Unto the Breach"
Levy on Judicial Selection in Canada
Pictures of Ohio's 88 County Courthouses Now on Display at Ohio Judicial Center
Opening available for Judicial Selection Commission








