Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Recording Industry vs The PeopleJudge in Capitol v. Thomas says "manifiest error of law" may have been committed by incorrect "making available" instruction
By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman
In Capitol v. Thomas, the case in which the RIAA obtained a $222,000 jury award, District Judge Michael J. Davis has sua sponte issued an order stating that he believes he may have committed a "manifest error of law" by giving the jurors an incorrect jury instruction which accepted the RIAA's "making available" theory.
The judge stated that neither Ms. Thomas's lawyer, nor the RIAA's team of lawyers, had brought to the Court's attention the controlling opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, in National Car Rental System v. Computer Associates, which had held that there can be no infringement of the 17 USC 106(3) "distribution right" without actual dissemination of copies or phonorecords.
The judge also noted that the RIAA had relied upon the initial, August 20, 2007, decision in Atlantic v. Howell, which had been vacated on September 27, 2007, a week before the trial.
The judge has ordered the parties to file briefs, has invited amicus curiae briefs, and has scheduled oral argument for July 1st.
[Ed. note. If it is true that neither Mr. Toder nor Mr. Gabriel cited the National Car Rental case, then, in my professional opinion, Mr. Gabriel and those involved in briefing Capitol v. Thomas for the RIAA have breached their duty to bring to the Court's attention controlling contrary authorities. Certainly Mr. Gabriel was aware of the case, as it has been cited in numerous briefs which my office, and which other lawyers all across the country, have filed, in cases where the RIAA was seeking to foist its "making available" theory on the Court. Interestingly, the scheduled date of the oral argument, July 1st, is the same date that Mr. Gabriel starts his new job as a state court judge in Colorado, so that one of the other clones will have to face a very angry Judge Davis that day. -R.B.]
May 15, 2008, suggesting possible manifest error of law and calling for briefs and oral argument*
* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation
Commentary & discussion:
p2pnet.net
Star Tribune
Ars Technica
Slashdot
ZDNet
The Patry Copyright Blog
Associated Press
TechDirt
Los Angeles Times
Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property
Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on May 15, 2008 (boomark / email).
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Toy Recall
RC2 Corporation agrees to $30 million Thomas and Friends lead paint contamination class action settlement.
Hotel Food Poisoning
Thomson Holiday and JMC-Thomas Cook awards British travelers a £2.5 million personal injury settlement.
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.

Breaking Development in Thomas Making Available Case
Faulty Jury Instruction over McDonnell Douglas Is NOT Reversable Error
Judge in First File-Sharing Trial: 'Oops, Maybe You Do Need Actual Distribution'
Judge Grants New Trial in Thomas Downloading Case
RIAA loses big: Judge Davis overturns $222,000 verdict, calls on Congress to act
Court reconsiders making available in file-sharing case







