Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBroome & Krawiec on Board Diversity & Signaling
By Lawrence Solum
Lissa L. Broome and Kimberly D. Krawiec (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - School of Law and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - School of Law) have posted Signaling Through Board Diversity: Is Anyone Listening? (University of Cincinnati Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
The ethnic and gender make-up of corporate boards has been the subject of intense public and regulatory focus in many countries, including the United States, in recent years. Of particular interest has been quantitative research on the impact, if any, of board diversity on corporate performance. This body of work leaves substantial gaps in our understanding of the precise mechanisms by which board diversity may alter the corporate environment, if indeed it does. In this symposium, we discuss some preliminary findings from our first 21 of a series of confidential, semi-structured interviews of 45 to 90 minutes in length with corporate directors. Due to multiple board service, these interviews represent 60 public company board experiences.
We limit our discussion in this Symposium to an analysis of the rationale for board diversity that figured most prominently in the interviews with our initial sample of respondents: signaling theory. Although signaling is frequently mentioned by our respondents and other researchers as a rationale supporting board diversity, we conclude that the distribution of costs and benefits of board diversity in "good" firms versus "bad" firms is unknown. We thus are unable to conclude that "bad" firms are not mimicking the signal, undermining the stability of board diversity as a meaningful signal. We, therefore, approach blanket assertions of the signaling benefits of board diversity with caution. We conclude that the signaling rationale for board diversity is at its strongest under particular conditions that may not exist at all corporations at all times.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on May 14, 2008 (boomark / email).
Fayette County School Board
faces sex abuse class action lawsuit
Undetected Sewage Spill
Prichard Water Works and Sewer Board spends $17 million on upgrades and testing.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Utilities Whistleblower
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities agrees to $485,000 fine for setting up a private bank account.
Wrong Bus
Greenbrier County Board of Education agrees to $15,000 negligence settlement after dropping a 5-year-old off at the wrong spot.

Broome & Krawiec on Board Diversity
Board Diversity Norwegian Style
Which firms get an F for diversity
UofL Law: Kudos: Diversity Award to Law Library Robin Harris







