Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Benefits & ERISA Law Blogs -> Benefits Biz Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Benefits & ERISA Law
: Benefits Biz BlogTo Redline or To Not Redline...
By Nick Curabba et al.
ADVERTISEMENTS
To Redline or To Not Redline...
Written by Nick Curabba
Back in February, we blogged about the IRS's odd new requirement to provide redlined plan documents with Cycle C determination letter requests. It appears that there were more than just Suzanne Wynn and us that thought this new document standard too cumbersome. During a session at today's ABA Section of Taxation meeting in Washington, D.C., Andrew Zuckerman from the IRS announced that, after receiving some bruising comments from the regulated community and practitioners, the Service has decided to pull back from the redlining brink. Rather than require the submission of documents showing changes and amendments, Mr. Zuckerman said plans will be "encouraged" to voluntarily submit redlined documents. Given the awfully large stick the IRS wields, we are curious as to the exact nature of this "encouragement." Further details are expected to be released by the Service in writing shortly, Mr. Zuckerman said
Full post as published by Benefits Biz Blog on May 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Western District Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Fitness Drink Maker
Western District Denies Derek Andrews' Motion for Reconsideration
Proposed Change to Fifth Circuit Rule Concerning Fee for Admission to Practice
New Guidelines Effective March 1, 2008







