Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Antitrust Review
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Antitrust ReviewAnother Apple Antitrust Lawsuit
By David Fischer
A few days ago, another lawsuit was filed against Apple for maintaining a monopoly in the digital music market (via slashdot). According to Information Week:
The complaint against Apple claims that the company controls 75% of the online video market, 83% of the online music market, more than 90% of the hard-drive based music player market, and 70% of the Flash-based music player market.…
The complaint takes issue with Apple’s refusal to support the Windows Media Audio format. “Apple’s iPod is alone among mass-market Digital Music Players in not supporting the WMA format,” it states, noting that America Online, Wal-Mart, Napster, MusicMatch, Best Buy, Yahoo Music, FYE Download Zone, and Virgin Digital all support protected WMA files.
This is based on the proposition that music companies “are generally unwilling to license their music for online sale except in protected formats.” Such assertions look increasingly tenuous as unprotected music becomes more widely available through legitimate channels. Amazon.com, for example, claims to offer “Earth’s biggest selection of a la carte DRM-free MP3 music downloads with more than 2.9 million songs from over 33,000 record labels.” A week ago, Amazon said that Warner Music Group would make its artists’ songs available in the unprotected MP3 format. EMI last year also began offering unprotected music online. And that’s to say nothing of Web sites like Amie Street that have been offering unprotected music from independent artists for even longer.
Apple, for its part, might reasonably claim it doesn’t want to license WMA from Microsoft, a cost the complaint speculates is unlikely to exceed $800,000, or 3 cents per iPod sold in 2005.
But the complaint goes beyond software licensing politics and charges Apple with deliberately designing its iPod hardware to be incompatible with WMA. One of the third-party components in iPods, the Portal Player System-On-A-Chip, supports WMA, according to the complaint. “Apple, however, deliberately designed the iPod’s software so that it would only play a single protected digital format, Apple’s FairPlay-modified AAC format,” the complaint states. “Deliberately disabling a desirable feature of a computer product is known as ‘crippling’ a product, and software that does this is known as ‘crippleware.’ “
More at The Unofficial Apple Weblog (“Here we go again”), MacUser (”People never get tired of suing Apple”) and Apple Unvarnished (”The lawsuit heads off into ridiculousness …“).
Technorati Tags: Apple, iTunes, antitrust
Full post as published by Antitrust Review on January 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
MasterCard
settles antitrust lawsuit with Amex for $1.8 billion
Apple Faces iPad Class Action
Apple Faces iPad Class Action
AT&T, Apple Face Potential Class Action over iPhone MMS
AT&T, Apple Face Potential Class Action over iPhone MMS
Payment Card Transactions
TravelCenters to pay $5 million settlement in antitrust lawsuit.
KoSa Ltd.
$33 million settlement reached in class action antitrust lawsuit.
OSB Antitrust
Norbord to pay $32.2 million settlement in class action lawsuit.

Apple Promises Uniform Pricing in EU, Ending Antitrust Investigation
"Apple Settles "Millions of Colors" Lawsuit"
Weyerhauser Loses Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit in Oregon As Jury Awards $28 Million
Two Promising International Antitrust Resources








