Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomUS v. Nacchio: The Government Seeks Rehearing En Banc
By J. Robert Brown
The Government has requested rehearing en banc by the entire 10th Circuit with respect to the panel decision in US v. Nacchio. The brief takes issue with the decision to reverse on the basis of the trial judge's decision not to hold a hearing before excluding the testimony of Daniel Fischel.
The brief is dry and procedural but takes the position that "the panel majority broke new ground in requiring a district judge, sua sponte, to call for a hearing or additional submissions about an expert’s reliability under Rule 702 where a motion to exclude has already raised that issue and the proponent, in his written opposition, has neither made a showing of reliability nor asked for a hearing." In addition to arguing that the holding is inconsistent with 10th Circuit precedent, the Government also argues that it conflict with better reasoned case law in the Third Circuit. See Oddi v. Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136 (3d Cir. 2000). To the extent the court upholds the panel, the Government asks for a less drastic remedy than reversal. As the brief notes:
- The Supreme Court has recently indicated that, where it is not clear from the record whether exclusion was actually erroneous, a limited remand for an admissibility inquiry by the district judge in the first instance is a more appropriate remedy than reversal for a new trial.
The argument is one of judicial economy (it is wasteful to always require a hearing) and judicial discretion ("The panel’s decision will likely have a chilling effect on judges who understandably read it to disfavor or prohibit exclusion of “contextual]” economic opinions — even ones that are superfluous or confusing.").
En banc hearings can only be ordered by a majority of the court and are not favored. The 10th Circuit rules provide that it is an "extraordinary procedure" intended for matters "of exceptional public importance." We'll make a prediction on the resolution of this motion but will wait until Nacchio and his team has filed a response (due May 15).
The Government's brief will be posted on the DU Corporate Governance web site later today.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on May 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Paulson Toxic Mortgage Debt Security Act: The Biggest Government Bailout of All Time
Legislative Proprosal for Treasury Authority to Purchase Mortgage-related Assets
Canadian Government
seeks new law enabling them to search your laptop
Qui Tam Whistleblower - Government Fraud - Qui Tam Lawsuit
Qui Tam Whistleblower alleging fraud against the government reported by an individual acting as a government whistleblower.
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Federal Government
alleging discrimination against black farmers
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.
US Federal Government
allegedly violated the niversal Declaration of Human Rights by deporting undocumented parents of US born children.

En Banc Hearing in Nacchio Case
"Full appellate court to review Nacchio case"
"Nacchio urges denial of full court review"
IGT Petitions for En Banc Rehearing: Asking Court to Allow Invalidity Defense for Improper Revival







