ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Details Emerge in eBay v. Craigslist

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

craigslistThe fuzzy edges around the eBay-Craigslist spat — the subject of a sealed complaint filed last week — came somewhat into focus yesterday with the release of a redacted version of the complaint.

EBay, which acquired a 28.4% stake in Craigslist back in 2004, creating an unlikely union between an Internet powerhouse and a classified listings site with a cult following, is now suing closely-held Craigslist in the Delaware Court of Chancery for diluting its stake. Last week, in a blog entry posted on its site, Craigslist said it was “surprised and very disappointed” by what it said were eBay’s “unfounded allegations.”

But, reports the WSJ, in a redacted version of the complaint made available yesterday, eBay alleges that Craigslist’s directors — founder Craig Newmark and CEO Jim Buckmaster — held clandestine meetings last October to dilute eBay’s stake after eBay created a rival to Craigslist, called Kijiji, a Web classifieds site. (Click here fore the complaint.)

Here’s the time line of events, according to the complaint:

    June 29, 2007: Ebay launched Kijiji in some U.S. markets (previously, it’d only been introduced outside the U.S.). The same day, Buckmaster sent a letter to eBay asserting that it had engaged in competitive activity.

    July 12, 2007: Buckmaster sent an email to Whitman, in which he expressed “negative” feelings toward eBay’s introduction in some U.S. areas. He also said “we are no longer comfortable having eBay as a shareholder, and wish to explore options for our repurchase, or for otherwise finding a new home for these shares.”

    July 23, 2007: Whitman responded, reassuring Buckmaster that eBay had taken steps to “completely firewall off” its Kijiji operations from the corporate management of its equity stake in Craigslist. She also said that eBay is “so happy” with its Craigslist relationship that “we would welcome the opportunity to acquire the remainder of (the company) we do not already own whenever you and (Mr. Newmark) feel it would be appropriate.”

    October, 2007: Buckmaster and Newmark, who together own 71% of Craigslist, held two board meetings with an outside lawyer, Edward Wes, without notifying eBay. The complaint alleges that the two-person board initiated a series of transactions — such as the issuance of “reorganization” shares and the initiation of a “poison pill” — in December 2007 and January 2008 that hurt eBay’s interests as a minority shareholder, including diluting eBay’s stake in Craigslist from 28.4% to 24.85% .

On its site, Craigslist said it will file its formal response to eBay’s suit in the next few weeks. “As those who know us best will recognize, every measure we have taken has been for the sake of protecting the long term well-being of the Craigslist community.”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on May 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0155 secs (new cache)